CWRU Forum Network Program

Case Western Reserve University is a partner of the Forum Network. Through an expanding network of partners, we intend to bring a diverse range of perspectives on both local and global issues to audiences around the world.

Case Western Reserve University

Podcast and Blog

Subscribe to Our Podcasts
Enter your email address:


frame image
frame image
Friday November 4th, 2011

Baker v. Carr After 50 Years: Appraising the Reapportionment Revolution – Panel 1: Districting and Apportionment Dispute: The Political Question Doctrine as Applied to Election Disputes, Including Bush v. Gore

Moderator

Jonathan H. Adler, Johan Verheij Professor of Law and Director, Center for Business Law and Regulation, Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Panelists

Nelson Lund, Patrick Henry Professor of Constitutional Law and the Second Amendment, George Mason University

Daniel Tokaji, Professor of Law, Ohio State University

S. Candice Hoke, Associate Professor of Law, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University

Friday November 4, 2011, 8:45 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

The Law Review Symposium at Case Western Reserve University School of Law

Next year marks the 50th anniversary of Baker v. Carr, the ruling that established the one-person/one-vote principle and led to profound changes in the way legislative districts are drawn at every level of government. U.S. federal courts are regularly embroiled in resolving districting and apportionment disputes, which have profound implications for the distribution of political power and influence throughout the nation as well as for the way public policies are made at the national, state, and local levels. Legal scholars and social scientists will address the many questions that have arisen from Baker v. Carr, including principles of districting, the nature of representation, voting rights, and the capacity of courts to resolve districting and apportionment disputes.

Download MP3 Audio (length: 1:18:37)
Download MP4 Video
Download Flash Video (flv)
Download Windows Media Video

Continue Reading – Baker v. Carr After 50 Years: Appraising the Reapportionment Revolution — Panel 1: Districting and Apportionment Dispute: The Political Question Doctrine as Applied to Election Disputes, Including Bush v. Gore


Recent Entries:

Baker v. Carr After 50 Years: Appraising the Reapportionment Revolution – Panel 2: Real Impact of Re-Districting on Elections
Baker v. Carr After 50 Years: Appraising the Reapportionment Revolution – Panel 1: Districting and Apportionment Dispute: The Political Question Doctrine as Applied to Election Disputes, Including Bush v. Gore
Baker v. Carr After 50 Years: Appraising the Reapportionment Revolution – Introduction and Main Speaker: Reapportionment and the Right to Vote: Baker’s Legacy
The Fall of the Faculty: Governing Universities in the 21st Century
The Goals of FDA Regulation and the Challenges of Meeting Them
Is Terrorism Worth Defining?
Saving Elections from Politics: A Doctrine of Separation of Campaign and State
Medical Malpractice Litigation: The Medical and Legal Perspectives
War Time: An Idea, Its History, and Its Consequences
The Road to Justice